Saturday, October 20, 2007

Outta here

I managed to wait until the Rector had been back from his Sabbatical for a week before entering his office and telling him I needed to move on. I think I worked here four years. It is finished. In order to allow them time to replace me, I am continuing at 12 hours a week for a while, but I can no longer manage juggling 30 hours a week at St. Jonah's with my online and live adjunct teaching.

The soundtrack for my life now consists of a battle between R.E.Ms "Losing my Religion" and A3's "[Not] Too Sick to Pray." I'm not sure I see the point in going to church anymore. I can receive teaching from books; I can pray alone. I am no longer sure of the validity of the Sacrament in my church, and how can I go to the other church, which has so abused its young, even if their leader does proclaim the truth? So fellowship? But all that seems to be at St. Jonah's and other churches is frantic busyness.

The Rector and I have little time to talk, now that I am on reduced hours, and as this morning was when he would be meeting with the newly convened human resource committee, I wanted to make some suggestions to him, so I kind of grabbed him as he was on his way out to go make good on the service he had sold at the services auction, more chain sawing. I should just accept the fact spoken loudly through the omission of any request on the part of anyone for an exit interview or from any input on me, the fact that no one wants my opinion. The way the vestry minutes read "we want our next Parish Administrator to not be a parishioner and to want to make this job a career goal" makes it sound as if there is no issue of burn out, of the job's forever no-win situation, and that it is all simply because I was not right for the job. Of course, most parishioners who have gotten the news have expressed their regret and their worry of what will happen without me. But the Vestry is, I see now, very complicit in the systemic dysfunction

So I mentioned to The Rector about how the previously tabled question of human support for parish hall rentals had come up again, and should be considered at the meeting. That was okay, that was within bounds. And then I more or less confronted him by saying "It seems like the Vestry got the idea that I was leaving for a better job. People have been congratulating me, but that is really not the case. I may not have any job at all next semester." I did not say how painful it was to be congratulated under false pretenses, with the perpetual uncertainty of being an adjunct hanging over my head. I did not directly say "did you tell them this?" but he did directly say that he told them there was an issue of burnout. I said I was glad, because you wanted whoever took over to be able to do this job and not leave. (How, I wonder, will anyone who is not a believer want to make the sacrifice of submission--do a job that would be better paid in the business world? How would a believer from some other denomination be able to put up with the nonsense? There are really not many people that I can imagine, but perhaps that is merely a sign of my burnout.) I then went on to mention how I had been looking at this book called "Simple Church" which criticized the program model and seemed to suggest that one needed a simple overview focus. And though the book didn't really seem to say anything earth-shattering, I thought its critique was useful: the danger of a program church is focusing on each specific program and losing sight of the simple whole. So I kept saying that what really needs to get fixed was systemic. I don't think I had entirely lost him there, but then I went on to tell him about the woman I met at a yoga class, who actually continues to support us financially, but never comes to church because it is so busy and chaotic. But I think the crushing blow was when I said, "I hear from lots of people who have no part of the whole Creativity thing. They don't know what's going on with it and they don't care."

"Are you done, now?" he asked.

"Yes," I said, and he swept out of my office. It is hard to recall that he was wearing his chain sawing clothes (jeans and a flannel church). There was such a feeling of the wind as he swept away, I can only remember it as a cassock swooping out.

It is true, back when they were writing the grant proposal, I helped them polish it up. By the time it came to me, it was far too gone in the process (a day or two before deadline) for me to challenge the idea itself, so I never said what I thought "this is the opposite of what St. Jonah's needs." It is just another chance to be busy and to shift the focus away from the Lord. Yes, I'm sure for the spiritually and creatively advanced people this effort be a work of spiritual adoration. For most of the parish it's more busyness. For me, it's more work. I knew, when I heard it, I'd commit to seeing them through it to the Rector's return and that would be it. Despite the fact that my only crime was speaking my truth, I of course, feel terrible. It has been my job to support and help the Rector, to maybe help him with small tweaks of the problems, not to ever say "you are on the wrong path." Perhaps the words from this Sunday's passage had influenced me, despite the fact that I hardly notice anymore what I am putting into the bulletin. "In the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who is to judge the living and the dead, and in view of his appearing and his kingdom, I solemnly urge you: proclaim the message; be persistent whether the time is favorable or unfavorable; convince, rebuke, and encourage, with the utmost patience in teaching. For the time is coming when people will not put up with sound doctrine, but having itching ears, they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own desires, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander away to myths. As for you, always be sober, endure suffering, do the work of an evangelist, carry out your ministry fully." (2 Tim 4) I will have to stand in this pain. I have no priest to turn to now.

The other day I had an inspiration and wrote down the thoughts I would like to write to the parish, in the newsletter, so that I can take control of the announcement of my departure. Now I am not sure I even want to bother, to give it a holy spin. Let it be the inkblot onto which they can project either their defenses or their awareness of the truth.

Here's what I wrote with pen.

I hope to be able to make time to pray, and to rediscover my own creative talents. While the Rector's time of re-entry may seem an unfortunate time for me to launch, it can also be a good time for a fresh start and for reconfiguring the structures which support St. Jonah's. I bid you to continue to tap into the creative energies which have been kindled and apply them to the question of our human structure and use of resources, so that the major burden of holding up the sky does not fall solely on clergy and staff. While it is likely that in a college community, we may have more prophets than helpers and administrators (see 1 Corinthians 13:28), I have to believe that St. Paul's vision of the loving body of Christ can be fulfilled in us. That even here, we have members who have received all the gifts necessary to create a vibrant life together that exalts Christ. I pray that it be so.

Should I bother?

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is one of those days I wish I had something witty and comforting to say, and some really sharp and useful advice to offer. The Nazz loves you no matter what, and you will find your way through this. I'll do what I can to help, even if it is that impossible task of shutting up (which you know is especially hard for me).

Isidora said...

The husband says I have made the error that people who give notice often make. The person thinks she can now speak freely; the people who are left now consider that person's thoughts irrelevant. I will give no more opinions. I will apologize to the rector and truthfully say it was mostly my own bitterness --my own sense that I have not fulfilled by creative or intellectual potential --that made me speak. I will stop work completely Nov. 2

Kirk Vandezande said...

If I worked where you have been for the last several years, my faith would be sorely tested and my outlook would be decidely cynical.

Paranthetically, your cycnicism and the humor it sparks in your blog is endearing, but I regret that your job has provided loads of ready material.

I wonder what separates the liberal brand of Christianity you witnessed from Unitarians and B'Hai? IMHO, there is no answer but the Nazarene, and I wonder where those who are proud to be liberal Episcopalians stand on Jesus.

My daughter is part of a theatre troupe that practices in a Unitarian church each week. So I have been standing around reading their tracts and bulletin boards. They believe in being good people, loving others and getting in touch with our spiritual selves. How that is worked out as doctrine seems not to be much more clearly defined that "Be good, accept everyone, and do the right thing." Unitarians are glad to honor the truth wherever they find it and they are proud not to be associated with a traditional religion. Accepting everyone means making no declarative faith statements.

Decades ago in college I knew a group of B'hai followers. Their doctrine seems similar to the Unitarians except that they worship a founder like the Mormons. In each case, the humanist religions are insistently agnostic about Jesus without addressing the evidence.

It seems to me that all flavors of Humanism are built on two doctrines:

1) A counterclaim to the notion that we have all fallen short of the glory of God, that we are straying sheep who need a shepherd. Instead, I am ok and you are ok, and that's the truth.

2) Because we are sufficient in ourselves, capable of realizing our immense human potential by paying attention to our inner being, We don't need no stinkin' saviour, thank you very much. And, as a matter of fact, yes I am God! And so are you, if you want to be.

So what do you say about Jesus of Nazareth? Was he really the Christ? Is his legacy a remarkable truth or a remarkable fraud? Or as CS Lewis argues, Was Jesus truly the Lord, or was he a diabolical liar or a self-deceiving lunatic?

If you conclude there is even a sliver of a chance that Jesus' claims in the Bible are in fact valid, then what alternative do we have? We are compelled seek to verify the claims by our own investigation. I can't prove anything to you about God by reasoning, but I believe by personal experience than God is still available if you will consider a date.

Ken Swanson wrote in Uncommon Prayer that God doesn't have favorites, but God has intimates. And each of us has an invitation to become one of God's intimates.

Pat said...

HI, doc,

Thank you for expressing yourself on your blog, and for all the other posts you've made (I caught up the other day).

Your quote from 2 Tim. was so apt. Comforting--in a way--to see this is not a new problem.

Just shake the dust off your feet and move on. I am praying for you, you have a beautiful deep and brilliant original faith.

Love,
Pat

Isidora said...

Kirk, do you think working in a more conservative Episcopal church would not leave one so cynical?

Doc

Kirk Vandezande said...

Doc,

No, in my experience, conservative or liberal leaning doesn't make any difference w/r/t cynicism and discouragement of church staff. For example, more than one friend I know has left a staff position in a "conservative" Anglican parish over the emphasis on a particular political agenda (same-sex marriages, chastity before marriage, Republicanism from the pulpit.

We depend on Christian hope for our shared joy, and our faith comes by experience of the transcendent reality of God. If we accept that God is there and He is not silent, and that God is much bigger than any of us, so then no individual can perceive alone all aspects of God's movement in our midst.

I believe that in my walk, God has sometimes spoken to me through the words and experience of others. Such events won't happen if, as a community of seekers, we are not devoting ourselves to listening for God and seeking to support each other in the same journey.

Credibility and verification of personal experience seems to be highly individual and delicate. It takes a long time for the faith community to grow in mutual trust and confidence. Without the dependable support of a community of believers who listen for God, we risk becoming deaf.

The question about liberals versus conservatives is more about how organizational priorities in a parish affect the spiritual focus of the members. I believe that when human worldly agendas (political, cultural, ethnic, just being human) become corporate objectives, experience of the Holy Spirit is made harder for many of us, whether clergy, or staff or lowly parishioner.

Kirk

Isidora said...

Yes, the worldly agendas are, I would agree, the problem. My husband and I recently joined a small group (renovare) which contains some baptists. He worried how he would deal if they started talking about picketing abortion clinics. I shrugged: no differently than I now deal with people picketing the war in Iraq. Same dif.