Saturday, November 19, 2005
Another translation of namaste
--my very wise yoga teacher's gloss on the familiar greeting.
Tuesday, November 08, 2005
Who was that man?
"You look like you're enjoying that sandwich."
"I am."
"You are lucky to have it."
"Yes, I am grateful for it."
He asked to use the phone and I said yes. I am oftentimes wary of people who come in asking for such favors. Sometimes, they can overstay their welcomes, or make me feel uncomfortable. But this man gave off a very calm, friendly feeling. He was a middle-aged African-American, wearing a knit cap over grayish white dreadlocks. He said he needed to use the phone, to help a friend of his get a phone installed, which seemed like an effort in keeping with our ministry. As he called the phone company, I could not help overhearing as he spoke in reasonable tones, gathering information for his friend, an older woman in Amherst. I realized that part of the reason I trusted him was because he spoke with an educated accent.
He told me afterwards that he was passing through. He always visited this lady on his way from Nantucket, where he lived, to Montpelier, where he had been invited to design a solar powered library. "How interesting," I said, and then he told me that the last time he was in our church, he had been visiting James Baldwin, who had been a visiting professor at the University at Pixieville. Having once been a denizen of the halls of the Englishland, I vaguely remembered having seen some posters dating to that era and knew he had spent some time here. He went on about how some other famous person found him and Baldwin talking and he said "oh, of course you know each other." I knew this to be shameless name dropping, but interesting nevertheless. I'm a sucker for famous writer stories. The man went on his way, and I expected not to see him again.
A day or two later, out of the corner of my eye, while driving through the grocery parking lot, I saw a homeless man moving large boxes towards some undeveloped land. I couldn't really see who it was, since I was in motion.
But then, the next day, I saw him again. Hard to miss him: he was wearing bright yellow pants, and that knit cap. It was the same man. How strange. Is he just a crazy homeless person? Is this how he travels from Nantucket to Montpelier? Is he really a solar architect? Whose reality is this?
Thursday, November 03, 2005
Paradox
This must be what happens when you make it to Centering Prayer group the previous day.
Tuesday, November 01, 2005
Be the Seaweed
And then, as I was walking to work after yoga, I saw a car parked, with a Be the Rain bumper sticker on it. I had seen those in the past, but not recently. The best I could get to with google is that it refers to a Neil Young lyric, which is about saving the planet. If you know more about this motto, please tell me.
Monday, October 03, 2005
A beautiful day in Pixieville, U.S.A.
Questioner: you call it meditation. Did you close your eyes?
Doc Bubbles: no, I couldn’t bear to, the day was so stunning. I sat by the Rotary Fountain that, in all its decrepit glory, set out four streams of water from four furry mouths. Sparrows came and splashed and drank from the top, then flew down and warmed their bellies on the hot concrete. I thanked God for them.
Questioner: Did you sit still?
Doc Bubbles: I shifted my position a few times, and moved to get out of the sun. It is still that warm, in October! And the sky brilliant blue! But I did focus on my breathing, I noticed my lungs filling with air and letting it go, while the water droplets splashed in the fountain.
Questioner: Did you find silence, at least?
Doc Bubbles: I heard it all and thought:
Little boy with fighter jets in each hand, zooming in on the fountain, Praise ye the Lord!
Backup-warning-beeps of great delivery truck, Praise ye the Lord!
Maple tree starting to turn, only letting one careful leaf drop with each breeze, Praise ye the Lord!
Old Tercel, with bumper stickers proclaiming an opinion on every issue arisen in the last 10 years, Praise ye the Lord!
Questioner: yet you call this meditation? This is just a kind of fair weather practice, that depends on the, well, fair weather.
Doc Bubbles: maybe it’s centering prayer
Questioner: maybe not
Doc Bubbles: It felt so good.
Questioner: meditation rises above feelings, does not get entangled in them, or dependent. What will you do on a gray day?
Doc Bubbles: so I shouldn’t rejoice in this most glorious day?
Questioner: rejoice if you want to, but don’t call it meditation or centering prayer.
Bubbles: just prayer?
Questioner: Doc Bubbles prayer, I’d say.
Doc Bubbles: Oh well.
Wednesday, September 14, 2005
Another thing cats are good for:
Tuesday, September 13, 2005
I'm St. Francis
You are Saint Francis of Assisi! You don't care
what you look like (or smell like) as long as
you can live simply and help the poor. You
should be receiving your stigmata any day now.
Which Saint Are You?
brought to you by Quizilla
Hmmm, so that's what that itching on my palms has been. Thought it was just poison ivy.
Good Samaritanitis
Funny thing is, I’m usually so cynical about the local folks that come around to the church asking for handouts, but suddenly I’m their advocate. “Hey, remember, we got homeless people here too.” You can help them without shipping stuff 2000 miles. They’re still just as destitute as ever. Just not as glamorous.
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
Processing Brother Roger's death
Tuesday, August 16, 2005
Lectionary Meditation: meek and what?
I know a lot of people who want to do what they can to make the earth a more peaceful, loving place. They believe that is what they are called, as Christians, to do, and I can't argue with that. But I wonder sometimes about the image of Jesus they evoke. These people want to ignore all the parables and actions of Jesus (like the one yesterday, in which he cursed a fig tree and whipped some people he didn't approve of, or today, where he mentions that the vineyard is going to be destroyed) that don't fit in with their image of Jesus, which seems to come from that Victorian ideal, Jesus "meek and mild." The right-wing Christians go too far in the opposite direction, and are all too eager to point out all the judgmental prophecies of destruction and damnation to those who don't understand God in the same way as they do. But I don't actually know too many people like that in real life (Thanks Be to God) and I do know the other kind, so it's their idolatry I want to talk about. It's idolatry when you create a God you're comfortable with, instead of opening yourself to a God who can't be narrowly defined. I just wonder how they've come up with this meek and mild ideal: it isn't a God after their own image, since none of them, that I know, are quite so sweet and passive. And the Jesus that's coming out of these readings from Mark, seems to be growing aware of his mission, an awareness that is concurrent with a growing anger at the way things are, anger that they aren't listening to him, anger that the vineyard is not operating the way it was intended.
Watermelons rock!
Monday, August 15, 2005
Lectionary Meditation: random act of defoliation?
Cursing the curse
Jesus sounds like he was in a bad mood that day, cursing a poor fig tree that was only doing what came naturally to it (not bearing fruit out of season), then going in and laying on the moneylenders, who were only doing what came naturally to them (as human beings)--commodifying--fracturing a living relationship with God into objects for consumption.
I always thought it a bit unfair, cursing the fig tree, since it was not its time to bear fruit, after all. But it starts to seem less like a hunger-based temper tantrum (something I am not unfamiliar with) if you start to see trees as fellow subjects of God’s kingdom rather than as simple mindless objects. To figure out what God might be thinking about trees, let's consider other important fruit trees: the ones in the Garden of Eden.
First, God established plant life, saying, “Let the earth put forth vegetation: plants yielding seed, and fruit trees of every kind on earth that bear fruit with the seed in it.” (Gen. 1:11) then God created Adam and “put him in the garden of Eden to till it and keep it” (Gen 2:15). So picture this as a place of continual growth and fruition, as Milton saw it, when he had Adam say, “Each Tree / Load'n with fairest Fruit, that hung to the Eye / Tempting, stirr'd in me sudden appetite /To pluck and eate; whereat I wak'd, and found / Before mine Eyes all real, as the dream [Paradise Lost Bk VIII, v. 306- 310]. From the beginning we were meant to eat, and be nourished by the Creation. Growing stuff and eating it: that’s Life 101. That’s the world that God blessed as good. The world God desired and loved. But that’s not the world that ensued after the Fall, when Adam and Eve ate the one fruit they were not supposed to eat. Not the world that Jesus entered and worked in, as a carpenter, a man who works with trees that are no longer living (wood), shaping dead objects from that which was meant to be living. And it is this fallen world of sweat and hunger, where plants do not feed us whenever we want, that Jesus is saying is wrong, is not the way it was meant to be… It is this cursing of the curse that we see when we view the withered fig tree, not a random act of defoliation.
Saturday, August 13, 2005
Discovery
--words that can only be spoken by a guy, recently presecribed an SSRI.
Sunday, August 07, 2005
More proof that cars are sentient beings
So the next time you see a speed trap, try, control your fingers. Don't warn the oncoming speeders with your headlights. Instead, let the cars know we still rule this planet. And we say "slow is beautiful."
Saturday, August 06, 2005
The Sanity of Trees
When I first saw how the beavers had turned the part of the trail up by the Brook trail into a lake, where it had been a flowing stream, I was sorry. The trees stand in water, dying, and the tops of the pines are orange-red. The water is murky. But today, when I arrived, a great blue heron arose and flew off, as did a couple other waterfowls. When I approached the water there was a squeak and a splash, and then another, as various frogs jumped from utter invisibility into the water, where they were even more hidden. I stood still, then moved again, trying to see them. Only occasionally could my eyes actually see one of the frogs as it went leaping through the water, like a skipping stone. My vision of this place was transformed. Instead of the nasty result of the too busy beavers like a bunch of manic engineers, I saw a paradise that wasn’t meant for me, but for these others; they delighted in their new home. All was well in the woods.
After a week in which there were two road rage shootings in the east of the state, and I cannot drive five miles from the house without encountering a car honking and trying to jut in and out of cars so it can go 80 in a 45 mph zone, I hear the sound of the train whistle, though I cannot see it from deep inside the late summer woods. How different a train whistle is from a car horn. Though it is announcing that it is coming--fast--and not stopping and get out of the way, all things which would be construed as hostile, and it seems a cry of kindness, of glorying in its own, harmless, energy. How different this country would be if the trains had won out over cars. I know there were many factors, mainly having to do with who could pay off the politicians more handsomely, that made our nation be developed along highways rather than rails, in the 20th century. It seems inevitable in retrospect: a society that values the individual above all, naturally should have gone with the most individualistic means of transportation. But perhaps it wasn’t inevitable, perhaps it is the cars’ fault. Think of it: cars are an alien species and they wanted to talk over the earth so they knew just how to play off on our individualistic tendencies, to cater to them, encourage and stoke them until they were utterly out of control and the cars are really in control. We drive killing machines, we become killing machines, what's the difference, we crash and kill or get out with guns and kill. The cars are happy either way, they win. (OK: I have just finished reading VALIS by Philip K. Dick. Check out www. philipkdickfans.com.)
Tuesday, May 10, 2005
Feeding our destruction
Perhaps it is simply that they have been ruined by the page-turning excitement of Harry Potter and its ilk, books which I too enjoy, but which I recognize as being relatively shallow and much more plot than character driven, as Harriet the Spy is. The generation growing up now may be avid readers, consuming novels like they were candy, but they are reading passively. However, the reason Harriet the Spy is no longer attracting readers is darker and sadder than that. This is why I have decided there is no hope for the future. These children are not able to identify with a character who is imaginative because they have not been permitted to develop their imaginations; they are too busy being driven around from one competitive sporting event to another. They cannot even fathom what is going on when she sits down with a friend and plays “town,” a game of simply imagining, because they have never been given a moment’s free time in which to invent something for themselves. Thus, unlike those of us who emulated Harriet, they will be impaired in their ability to understand what it is like to be inside someone else’s skin. I rest my case. The world ain’t getting any better on account of our kids. We have given birth to our destruction (well, I haven’t, I have allowed my womb to remain unused) but in the collective sense… our destruction has been born and we are feeding it.
Friday, May 06, 2005
So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish
What is truly entertaining about The Hitchhiker's Guide is verbal: puns and witty language. They do a good job with the Guide itself, but that may be the only thing that is really enhanced by the medium. The Hitchhiker's Guide began as a book, and enjoyed success as a radio play, (or was it the other way around? --I'm sure someone can tell me) but in either case, those are both media that emphasize language. So while the effects are there, they aren't anything you won't see in all the other space movies: the pleasure lies in old fashioned good lines.
The folks on the ASLE list had noted the film's ecological awareness. Indeed, it portrays the earth as a wonderfully amazing planet ("this fragile earth, our island home" as the Book of Common Prayer has it) and of course England may well be the most beautiful place of all. I was reminded of the elegiac quality of The Lord of the Rings' portrayal of hobbiton, which is of course really England. And it is also similar in that while there is this desire to get back to home, he finds he enjoys travel and decides to go off in search of the Restaurant at the End of the Universe, just as Frodo finally chooses to go off to the Gray Havens. Adams and Tolkien seem to share a love for their homeland that is energized by the awareness that one must ultimately leave it, and that its beauty is pointing to something even Greater. Adams idea that the Earth is a computer calculating the meaning of life is, to me a wonderful way of understanding Creation.